.
Feedback

State Senate Knocks Down Anti-Bullying Bill for Second Time

Here is a wrap-up of some of the latest political news.

Losing by one vote, the Illinois Senate has again rejected legislation requiring schools to adopt more detailed policies against bullying. According to The Associated Press, the bill says schools must spell out how students can file anonymous complaints, how complaints will be investigated and what can happen to students who bully classmates. The legislation left it up to schools to decide how each requirement would be met.

The May 29 vote on House Bill 5290 was 29-21, but the bill needed 30 votes to pass. It also came up short last week.

Some conservative groups, such as the Illinois Family Institute, see the anti-bullying bill as cover for schools to lecture students about accepting homosexuality. They want to add a provision letting students and teachers skip any lesson that might contradict their religious beliefs.

Area lawmakers who voted for the bill were: Sen. Don Harmon (D-Oak Park) and Sen. John Millner (R-Carol Stream); voting against were Sen. Chris Lauzen (R-Aurora) and Sen. Christine Radogno (R-Lemont). Voting present were Sen. Kirk W. Dillard (R-Hinsdale) and Sen. Steven N. Landek (D-Bridgeview). And, Sen. Ron Sandack (R-Downers Grove) did not vote.

Judges May Be Unscathed in Pension Battle

Judges would be exempt from legislation intended to curb the rising cost of public pensions in Illinois by reducing benefits for recipients, Illinois Statehouse News is reporting.

Judges receive the highest average annual pension of any public employee, yet their benefits would remain untouched, according to legislation introduced by Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan.

The nearly 1,000 retired judges earn an average annual pension of more than $112,000. The average public employee retiree draws an average annual pension of about $40,000.

If the current changes to public pensions manage to squeak out of the General Assembly and get Gov. Pat Quinn's OK, the public unions would probably sue the state.

Ultimately, the fate of the legislation would be decided by the justices of the Illinois Supreme Court, who, coincidentally, are members of the public pension Judges' Retirement System.

Illinois House President Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) said judges were left out of the legislation to avoid a conflict of interest. According to Illinois Statehouse News, Madigan danced around questions of whether the omission of judges was a way to get a favorable ruling from the Illinois Supreme Court.

Leaving judges' pensions alone has some precedent. Judges were exempted when the state scaled back pension benefits in 2010 for new employees.

Gambling Bill Goes to Senate

The House approved a gaming expansion bill, and the Senate will probably take a floor vote on it before adjournment, according to Illinois Issues. Sponsors say they think Senate Bill 1849 would pass in the Senate. However, Quinn is opposed to the bill, so supporters would likely be seeking support to override a veto sometime down the road.

Sen. Lou Lang (D-Skokie) defended his bill last week during a floor debate. Quoted by Illinois Issues, he said: “When we have almost 8 percent of our people out of work, when we can’t cobble a state budget because we don’t have enough revenue, when the 30,000 or 40,000 jobs in the horse racing industry are disappearing, when our convention and trade shows are down—when they should be up—when thousands of our people every day get in their cars and drive through Chicago and the south suburbs of Cook County and spend their money in Indiana, I think this is much more than a bright shiny object. I think this is an imperative for state government to move this forward.”

The measure aims to open five casinos statewide, in Chicago, Park City, Danville, Rockford and in the south suburbs of Chicago. The exact location of the fifth casino would be up to the Illinois Gaming Board to decide. The bill includes slots at horse racing tracks but does not allow for slots at the Illinois State Fairgrounds or Chicago airports, which Quinn previously bashed publicly.

The bill also aims to reduce the number of gaming positions available from 2,000 in the original bill to 1,600. Casinos currently are allowed 1,200 positions. The Chicago-owned casino proposed in the plan would be allowed 4,000 positions. Lang said the bill clarifies language about the oversight of the Chicago casino, something Quinn had cited previously as a concern.

Shane May 31, 2012 at 11:44 am
The news is too depressing to read anymore. Our country is in trouble.
Wash Woman May 31, 2012 at 11:58 am
How do you vote against a bullying bill?
Sounds like the real bullies are the lawmakers.
Jim Court May 31, 2012 at 01:03 pm
These groups do not have to accept homosexuality. That is their right. No one should have the right to bully people. Not politicians, police officers, your neighbor, bosses,romantic partners, code enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges. The list is long.
I believe the term hate crime is applied to loosely. I see so many failures from our political "leaders" that yes, I am concerned for our once great nation. I do not want to be a pessimist but sometimes there seems to be no other choice.
Steven Bayne May 31, 2012 at 01:08 pm
The bill is too broad and vaguely worded. It justifies intervention and prosecution as a function of how good the plaintiff's lawyer is, rather than how severe the abusive behavior. The problem has not been the lack of good lawsbut the unwillingness of teachers and administrators to enforce existing rules and statutes. It would be better to create a law carrying the threat of punitive action against any *administrator or teacher* who knowingly fails to act on clear evidence of harassment.
interested reader May 31, 2012 at 10:17 pm
$112,000 pension for judges? cut that in half and redirect the savings to teachers and employees who actually work for a living.
Independence666 June 1, 2012 at 08:47 am
We don't need an anti-bullying law. Kids must learn how to handle this kind of thing on their own. They will encounter bullies at every stage throughout their lives. They need to learn to stand up and fight back as early as possible. Kids must develop a sense of self worth and resolve not to tolerate being bullied. The nanny state will only make these kids weaker, if they get involved.
Wash Woman June 1, 2012 at 02:01 pm
The Illinois initiative, which would have held school administrators more accountable for handling bullying incidents and preventing harassment, fell one vote short of passing. It did not pass because special interest groups viewed the bill as having a pro-homosexual agenda. The thing is, straight kids are bullied right along with fat kids, short kids, homely kids, smart kids, slow kids, clumsy kids, shy kids, and gay kids.
Having kids handle it on their own does not work. It is impossible to develop a sense of worth when your peer group ridicules you. Adults that do nothing against bullies are giving their tacit approval to this behavior. It is not OK to pick on the weaker kid and then tell the kid to deal with it. That is bullying.
Independence666 June 2, 2012 at 05:50 pm
I disagree, Wash Woman. When a kid is allowed to fight his/her own battles it gives him/her a sense of self worth and control that he/she would never get if someone else always fights his/her battles for him/her. I know from my own personal experiences that standing up to bullies gives you an incredible feeling of self respect, growth, and accomplishment. Kids need to learn how to stand up to these jokers as early as possible. Despite all of the efforts to eliminate them from society, there will always be bullies among us. Our kids should not be taught rely on their parents, teachers, or government to fight their battles for them. They will not be our babies forever.
Jim Court June 2, 2012 at 10:56 pm
Independence.
These are kids. Not every person has the physical stature to stand up to bullies, Some do not have the emotional resilience. Yes, to whatever degree is possible to stand up to a bully, lessons can be learned. What if you had a son or daughter who was much bigger than they were. They try to stand up only to find even bigger problems created. What are their options? Bullying should not be allowed plain and simple.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Elmhurst Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jamie June 18, 2013 at 09:08 pm
There have been some negativity lately surrounding C-F, but it is really only community involvmentRead More like the one in this story that will make the school even better.
Jim Court June 17, 2013 at 11:56 am
Claire, You present a very well thought out understanding of TIFs and your logic is impeccable.
Patty Pistone Fritsch June 17, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Can we get the name of the shelter, we work with a shelter in Oak Park, that may be able to save aRead More few of these little pups before its too late for them!
Geneva Vikings June 17, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Patty...it's Casey's Safe Haven. Reach us atcaseysdogs@yahoo.com. Any help would be great!