.
Feedback

Elmhurst Alderman Announces He's Running for Mayor

There has been speculation for months, but Alderman Mark Mulliner confirmed Thursday he is "taking the quantum leap."

Seventh Ward Alderman Mark Mulliner says changes need to be made in Elmhurst's leadership to get the city back on track. 

He's got some ideas on how the city can spur economic development without adding any more more tax increment financing districts, share resources with other local entities and better perform its "core and fundamental functions" to keep property values up.


The time is right, he said Thursday, to throw his hat into the ring in the race for mayor. The Consolidated Election is April 9, 2013.

Mulliner said it's time to capitalize on opportunities facing Elmhurst.

"We've had some major changes. Every one of our leaders on the administrative side has changed," he said, referring to Elmhurst's new city manager, park director, school superintendent, library director and others. "We have a great opportunity to build on the traditions that we have, but also look at some new ideas."

No New TIFs

The City Council is just one vote away from approving a new (the city's fourth), and have begun working their way toward approval.

"We did our fourth TIF district. We're done," he said to residents holding "Mulliner" campaign signs in front of the City Centre fountain. "It's time for us to look at some other solutions."

He said Elmhurst shouldn't have to use .

"We can entice businesses to come into this community and build here, and we don't have to do it using dollars from the taxpayers," he said.

One idea he mentioned was rezoning certain areas in industrial parks for development. He said with Elmhurst being a "vibrant community," development can happen, and already is happening, without TIF.

"We've got economic development going on all over this community," he said. "You look around downtown, and there are great things happening. There are great things happening in the area of York and Vallette, Spring Road, York and Butterfield.

"We just need to get creative, and I think we can get creative," he said. "We've just got to think of some alternate ways of raising revenue."

Shared Resources

Mulliner said he will make it a priority to share resources intergovernmentally.

"We've got great leadership at the City Council, the Park District, the School District, and I think we can work much more closely together," he said.

He used the example of the Park District's expertise in maintaining the parks as being a useful asset to all areas of the city.

"Let them take care of not just (green space) in the park and School District, but in all locations," he said.

He said sharing resources could be as simple as sharing building space.

"I think it's critical these days with limited resources that we work together … so each one of those governmental agencies can get back to their core and fundamental purposes," he said.

The purpose of government, he said, is threefold: Provide public safety by having the best-trained police and fire personnel, make sure the schools are highest quality and bring in new business.

History of Service

A lifelong Elmhurst resident, Mulliner formerly was Unit District 205's director of technology and an Elmhurst Public Library trustee for six years. He has been an alderman in the 7th Ward for 13 years.

"I used to work for the School District, so I understand schools. I've worked with members of the Park Board, so I understand what their function is, and I also understand that a City Council is a board running a $100 million operation," he said. "As the leader of that board, you understand what your responsibilities are, and that's the most critical thing."

He currently sits on the city's Finance, Council Affairs and Administrative Services Committee, where he against allowing City Council members to hold more than one elected position at a time. He was the lone committee member to hold firm on placing a on the November ballot.

He said he didn't do any of that to boost his visibility for a mayoral race.

"I was probably more in the limelight than I usually am," he said. "But I had been thinking about (running for mayor) for a long time before that."

He said his announcement Thursday will not affect his day-to-day work on the City Council.

"It's going to be a long campaign, (but) I don't think it's going to change anything," he said. "We'll just keep moving forward. It's just about what's in the best interest of Elmhurst. That's the key."

Mulliner, who owns School Technology Services Inc., said he has the full support of his wife of 28 years, Barb, and his two grown children, Jason and Amanda.

"They've all decided it's OK for me to go ahead and take this quantum leap," he said.

Elmhurst Mayor Pete DiCianni is running for DuPage County Board in District 2 and has as mayor if elected. So far, Mulliner is the only candidate to announce for mayor. Candidates have until Dec. 24 to file nomination papers.

Doremus Jessup August 24, 2012 at 10:58 am
This is good news for Elmhurst in my opinion.
BL August 24, 2012 at 11:25 am
So, one of the leading proponents of TIFs on the council for the past 13 years now suddenly says he's done with TIFs. Interesting. His feelings on TIFs seemingly have done a 180 since this past Monday night.
D L August 24, 2012 at 11:35 am
A change is very much needed at the top. Glad to see a qualified candidate throwing his hat in the ring.
BL August 24, 2012 at 01:38 pm
I'll take "Things less likely to happen before the Cubs win a World Series" for $1000 please Alex
RobertAWilson August 24, 2012 at 01:49 pm
A lot can happen in the next 8 months. I'm not getting too excited about this race yet and I expect Alderman Mulliner to approve TIF 4 in a week, despite his new pronouncement that he's against more TIFs.
Steve August 24, 2012 at 05:40 pm
I think some of you should re-read this article.
"We did our fourth TIF district. We're done," he said to residents holding "Mulliner" campaign signs in front of the City Centre fountain. "It's time for us to look at some other solutions." He is supporting the fourth TIF but is also stating he doesn't see a need for any more TIFs after this one.
BL August 24, 2012 at 06:20 pm
Steve - good point, but it begs the question, why? Is there something magical about having 4 TIFs? If they work, and apparently Mulliner thinks they do, then what's wrong with 5 or more? If they don't work, making more than 4 problematic, then why support them at all? If Mulliner wanted to argue no other areas of the city need them, fine, but he doesn't. The article quotes him as saying "It's time for us to look at some other solutions."
The reality? Mulliner believes TIFs work, because his record and comments support that sentiment, but he is going to play politics with them now. He will be the second consecutive longest serving Alderman (after Susan Rose) to lose a mayoral election.
Steve August 24, 2012 at 07:59 pm
I am not here to defend what Mr. Milliner believes or doesn't believe about TIFs. I just wanted to correct some of the comments made because it seems like some people mis-read the article.
I will let Mr. Mulliner speak to his position on economic development. I would assume there will be many opportunities for you and others to challenge him on his position on TIFs, past and present.
Bob Santini August 24, 2012 at 08:58 pm
@ BL and others; seems like you are kinding of reading more into his statement than what was actually said. first, mulliner has not cast a vote on tif 4; no one has. the last vote was to accept the report, not on approval of the tif itself. second, i believe that he, like many others, actually would have supported tif 4 whole heartedly if its boundaries had been what was requested by bram, gutenkauf, etc in the first place (being just that portion that is north of 290). so the important thing is to actually wait and see how everybody votes, and maybe listen to their reasoning for their votes; instead of making a generalization based on what may or may not happen. however, more importantly, the fact that other tifs worked, and are still in existence, is all the more reason to perhaps be cautious about tiffing the whole city, because if we rush into tifs 5 & 6 solely on the basis that previous tifs worked, people are going to see one of two things: either the city will have to go into debt to finance its basic operations; or your property tax bill will go up by 50% while your house value stays at its 2002 valuation. contrary to what the consultants say, there is no free lunch in a tif. and the biggest downside is that the school district will suffer; and when school district suffers, property values also suffer as a result. so for all you pro-business capitalist/socialists who like government intervention, why not just tif the whole city because they ALWAYS work.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Elmhurst Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jamie June 18, 2013 at 09:08 pm
There have been some negativity lately surrounding C-F, but it is really only community involvmentRead More like the one in this story that will make the school even better.
Jim Court June 17, 2013 at 11:56 am
Claire, You present a very well thought out understanding of TIFs and your logic is impeccable.
Patty Pistone Fritsch June 17, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Can we get the name of the shelter, we work with a shelter in Oak Park, that may be able to save aRead More few of these little pups before its too late for them!
Geneva Vikings June 17, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Patty...it's Casey's Safe Haven. Reach us atcaseysdogs@yahoo.com. Any help would be great!