Letter: Taxing Residents in Anticipation of Returning Money to Elmhurst Memorial Hospital is Unfair

Alderman Diane Gutenkauf says there are many options available—other than taxing residents—to repay the hospital if it regains tax-exempt status.

On Monday, Dec. 5, the Elmhurst City Council

The council was presented with a majority report from the Finance and Council Affairs Committee that proposed a tax levy in the amount of $9,236,942. This amount represents an increase of 4.5 percent over the 2010 levy amount. We were also presented with a minority report proposing a lower levy of $9,034,614, representing an increase of 2.25 percent over what we levied in 2010.

Both reports included an argument that the City Council must account for a change in the tax status of Elmhurst Memorial Hospital. Due to state regulators reclassifying the hospital as a for-profit entity, the land they own will appear on our tax rolls valued at approximately $38 million. They will pay property tax based on this combination of tax status and valuation. The hospital has appealed the ruling and anticipates a return to nonprofit status in the future. Both FCA Committee reports proposed increasing the tax levy with the anticipation we will be required to repay the hospital any tax we collect. The exact amount we would owe the hospital depends on the final tax rate, but it is approximately $198,000.

At Monday's council meeting, I argued extensively that taxing all residents to anticipate returning money to the hospital was unfair. We have many options should this repayment be required. For example, we could tap our line of credit, find the money in our general fund or revisit our tax levy amount in FY2012. I believe that raising the tax levy amount at all is a tax on all citizens, even though the levy would be spread out over more payers once the hospital is included.

When the majority report was placed before us, last night, Alderman (Kevin) York motioned to substitute his minority report with its lower levy amount. I proposed an amendment to that report lowering the total proposed tax levy to 2010 levels of $8,835,952. Should the hospital tax status remain for-profit, taxes would stay flat or even slightly lower for residents since the levy amount would spread across more payers. Should the status revert to nonprofit we would reimburse the tax collected in one of the ways outlined above.

The vote to accept the amendment was tied. Mayor DiCianni broke the tie by voting against my proposal to lower taxes for Elmhust residents. The council then considered the minority report in its original state. If the minority report did not pass, we would have been forced to consider the majority report and its higher tax levy. I chose the lesser of two evils and voted to accept the minority report, thus helping to prevent consideration of the higher property tax proposed in the majority report.

My first choice however, would have been to keep rates flat. Unfortunately, the mayor's tie-breaking vote made that impossible. 

— Diane Gutenkauf, 1st Ward alderman

Cincinnatus December 06, 2011 at 10:44 PM
Alderman Gutenkauf's amendment to have zero tax levy increase tied in the City Council 7-7, with Mayor DiCianni breaking the deadlock.
Tea Bagger December 06, 2011 at 11:46 PM
Alderman Gutkenkauf - why didn't you "argue extensively" last year when you signed the report raising taxes ALMOST 5% and then voted to RAISE taxes 5%? To try to position yourself this way now is laughable. You did your damage last year.
James Heartferd December 07, 2011 at 02:12 AM
In sitting at the council meetings the past couple of years I have come observe how the old monarchy of Gutkenkauf Bram and Pezza and maybe Mulliner are fighting everything that the majority is trying to accomplish to move the City of Elmhurst foward. I think it is time that these sore loosers move out of their rusty seats.
Lurker December 07, 2011 at 05:30 PM
Alderman Gutkenkauf is not an effective part of the council and should not run again. She seems to be against moving the City forward in ways presented by the mayor and newer members of the council. Thank you for your service to the city.
RobertAWilson December 07, 2011 at 08:00 PM
are you saying that the only way to move the city forward is to raise taxes? I don't think most of the city agrees with you.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something