.

Consultant Says Lincoln's Hahn Concept a Better Deal for Elmhurst

Lincoln Property's Hahn Street plan will result in a net gain of almost $11 million to the City of Elmhurst, consultant says.

Lincoln Property's proposal for Hahn Street. View is from the north, looking southwest. (File photo)
Lincoln Property's proposal for Hahn Street. View is from the north, looking southwest. (File photo)

By Carol Kania Morency

Of the many factors Elmhurst officials must consider when deciding between two visions for the Hahn Street properties, one major question is, which would be the better investment? 

Monday night, a consultant’s analysis may have tipped the balance toward the proposal floated by Lincoln Property Co.

Last month, Lincoln and fellow finalist Morningside Group outlined their plans for the 10-acre parcel between York and Addison Avenue, just north of Hahn Street. The parcels are now part of the North York Road tax increment financing district, which stretches up to Grand Avenue.

Robert Rychlicki from Kane McKenna, a consultant the city uses to evaluate its TIF districts, outlined the differences between the two plans on Monday. Lincoln is proposing a five-story building with 216 apartment units and 14,000 square-feet of leasable retail space. Morningside has presented both a four-story building with 139 apartments and a six-story building with 207 apartments. Both Morningside plans would feature 12,000 square-feet of retail space.

The differences can be seen when bids for the land and permit fees paid to the city come into play. Lincoln is willing to pay $2.5 million for the land; Morningside is offering just more than $1 million for the six-story proposal. Lincoln also is asking for $500,000 in assistance from the TIF building fund; Morningside wants at least $3 million for both the four- and six-story buildings.

According to Rychlicki, all of this adds up to a net gain of almost $11 million to the city if the Lincoln plan gets built. The six-story Morningside plan is expected to be a gain of about $5.6 million, and the four-story idea only $16,000.

Because the Council also had to finish its budget discussion on Monday, aldermen will ask their questions about Rychlicki’s analysis at a special Committee of the Whole meeting next Monday.

Related:

NancyC December 04, 2013 at 07:39 AM
Aren't the tax payers supposed to decide which is the better investment of THEIR cash?
Idont Givitout December 04, 2013 at 06:01 PM
I agree, and really why are there consultants being involved with which proposal is better. should this not be a function of the council/committee(s). Yet more money wasted by Elmhurst bureaucracy.
TheRedBaron December 04, 2013 at 07:45 PM
Do you people know how a government is run? We elect people to city council to make decisions like this FOR US. Not everything will come to us for a vote, so if you don't like their decisions vote them out. And the council is made up of people like you and me, not experts in the building industry. So for a decision of this magnitude they seek the advice of people who do this for a living. Maybe a civics refresher would do people some good.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something