patching...
Update: Have you liked us on Facebook yet? »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Congressman Roskam Passes on 'Obamacare Challenge'

Back on June 20, I wrote to my 6th District Congressman Peter Roskam, a relentless critic of Obamacare, and requested he take the Obamacare Challenge:

"Dear Congressman Roskam: How about foregoing your Rolls Royce health insurance plan that we taxpayers pay for and go without any health insurance for you and your family for the next three months? You foes of Obamacare love to point out that the tens of millions of medically uninsured can easily get good health care from the Emergency Room. OK, for the next three months you and your loved ones can only get health care from your local Emergency Room. Based on your philosophy, that should work out just fine. Prescription drugs? Going without health insurance for drug coverage means you will have to pay full price. In your case, that means dipping into your near 1% wealth. For the actual uninsured, it means dipping into rent money".

Not receiving a reply, I called his Washington office twice now seeking a response. Both times the staff members refused to even acknowledge my request much less discuss its merits. They did, however, read from their taking point memo that the Congressman is working diligently to get adequate heath care for everyone once Obamacare is overturned.

Apparently, Congressman Roskam continues to deny the reality that as the benefits of Obamacare begin to trickle down to the currently insured - children allowed to stay on their parents' health insurance till age 26; no co-pays for womens' essential reproductive health, including birth control; refund checks to folks whose insurance companies' administrative costs exceed 20% of revenue - the tide of pubic opinion has issued its own stamp of approval.

Least you think the Obamacare Challenge is a joke, we should recognize that one former colleague of Roskam took the Obamacare Challenge. Steve Kagen, who represented Wisconsin's 8th District from 2007 to 2011, turned down the Congressional Health Benefits Program saying, "I'll tell you what. I respectfully decline. Until you can make the same offer to everyone that I have the honor of representing, I just don't think it's fair." No person had to prompt Congressman Kagen to do that, but his conscience sure did.

Meanwhile, as Congressman Roskam continues to posture on behalf of his benefactors in the health insurance industry and the 1% who oppose virtually every governmental effort to help the needy, desperate folks among the tens of millions without adequate medical resources continue to go bankrupt, suffer declining health and even die.  I can get along very well without my Congressman either taking or responding to my Obamacare Challenge. But the people who continue to suffer in the face of such heartless insensitivity cannot.

Curt Kimball

8:17 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

My, my, aren't we preoccupied with the 1%? Let's examine facts: who belongs to that evil, wealthy 1%? Look! It's none other than the Obamas, the Pelosis, the Reids, George Soros, David Letterman, Bill Maher, Alec Baldwin, Barbara Streisand, George Clooney, all Hollywood producers, directors, movie and TV stars, etc. Where are all of these fire-bomb throwing liberals when it comes to 'distributing the wealth'? Are they 'paying their fair share' in taxes, or do they fully use the tax shelters that the IRS rules allow? Are they voluntarily giving away vast sums of their wealth to the needy for food, shelter and health care? The answer is yes to tax shelter use, and no to distributing their wealth for the common good. Are THEY the 1% that you and the Democratic party are targeting? Or are they all exempt, and there is a 'special' group of the 1% who needs their wealth confiscated and distributed? A little self-examination would do Progressives good, but it will never happen as they twist and spin numbers and stories for their own benefit....

Reply

John Mihas

8:34 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

You forgot to add Koch,Mitt,Sheldon Adelson,Issa, among others. It works for both sides.

Reply

DG Guy

8:42 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Walt nobody questions that people benefit from the healthcare act in the short term. What is at issue is the cost and what it will do to the quality of healthcare longterm. Somebody has to pay for this system. Right now it's just the 1% footing the bill but since most of the cost containment clauses of the healthcare act were stripped out, the cost of our healthcare will quickly outgrow the wallets of the 1%. Eventually everyday people will have to foot the bill. You yourself may actually have to pay for this program you think is so wonderful. It's all a great idea when you can stick the bill to someone else. Let's see what you think in 10 years when you're paying it.

Reply

Doremus Jessup

8:47 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Mr. Kimball, many of the people you mention have made their money actually working for it so it is taxed as regular income, I think the problem many have with some of the 1 percent is that they make money off of money and it is taxed at the capital gains rate. To some people the guy paying 13 percent off the money he made from money unlike the guy making money by working for it seems less than fair. I think we can have a discussion on tax policy that takes into account whether it is fair to tax capital gains so low compared to regular income tax. I think Chuck Norris, Wilfred Brimley, Craig T. Nelson and other right ring Hollywood types would agree with me.

Reply

McCloud

9:26 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

The real heartless insensitivity is that more and more people left without a choice but to become dependent on the government, as is happening under the current administration. It is both demoralizing for the individual and unsustainable for the few that actually pay for it.

Reply

DG Guy

9:29 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Doremus - You're overlooking that fact that people like Romney first worked for their money and had it taxed as income using the higher rate. Then they invested what was left after taxes and are now being taxed a second time at the lower rate. A lot of the "what's fair" discussions skip that first step.

Reply

Doremus Jessup

9:36 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

DG, I'm not skipping it because it is not being taxed twice only the gains above the investment are being taxed. If I invest $100 in Apple and sell my share at $110 only the $10 is taxed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DG Guy

9:52 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Doremus - You miss the point. The $100 you invest in apple didn't come to you tax free out of the blue. First you go out to your regular job and make $150. You get taxed at 30% leaving you about $100 after taxes. Then you invest the $100, sell at $110 and are taxed at a lower rate on the $10.

Doremus Jessup

9:59 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

DG, I did not miss the point, you lacked a point. You could have admitted you were wrong but you chose not to. Had you caught me in a mistake I would have admitted it.

Reply

Kristina Sargent, DC, MS-ACP

11:37 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Question: The system is clearly broken. But is it because of who is paying for it? Or is it because the paradigm of prescriptions for lifestyle and chronic disease doesn't work.
What if people spent their money on fruits and vegetables from Aldi instead of the junk food? What if people took responsibility for their health? 70% of the country is overweight and obese - this is not because they have a drug deficiency.

I AM NOT saying medical care isn't necessary. I AM NOT saying that prescription drugs don't save lives. I AM saying that maybe it would be more affordable, if Americans would do what we are known for - being tough, taking responsibility, do what we need to do to make this country great again.

The system is broken because the paradigm doesn't work...

Reply

Paul

2:26 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

dg guy!!! So what!!! If you make 40 mill a year on investments then pay more than 13% or 15%. Its income!!! Tired of the crap folks like romney who just do not pay the percentage that I pay and millionfsof other hardworking american pay. You arguement is mute. Why should my wife and I pay 23% which is what we paid last year and romney gets away with 13%? Let me guess, trickle down economics which does not work!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

DG Guy

2:46 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Ugghh, That's not what I said.

DG Guy

2:48 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Per the Congressional Budget Office. Here are the Average Total Federal tax rates by income class as of 2009 (latest data)

Lowest Quintile 1%
Second Quintile 6.80%
Middle Quintile 11.10%
Fourth Quintile 15.10%
Highest Quintile 23.20%
Top 1 Percent 28.90%

Notice that the top 20% and top 1% pay higher rates. These are averages over all of the peolpe in that income category. Not one specific guy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DG Guy

2:55 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Related to that:
Here are the shares of total taxes paid per income category. Also from the CBO. Notice that the top 20% of income earners pay 67.90% of all federal taxes collected. Tha's 20% of the peolpe paying 68% of the bills. The middle class is clearly NOT the group paying all of the taxes.

Lowest Quintile 0.30% of all taxes collected
Second Quintile 3.80% of all taxes collected
Middle Quintile 9.40% of all taxes collected
Fourth Quintile 18.30% of all taxes collected
Highest Quintile 67.90% of all taxes collected
Top 1 Percent 22.30% of all taxes collected

McCloud

3:01 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Personally, Romney paid too much income tax, as 15% is far too high for risk takers to take risks in this Obama economy. Lower it to zero, and maybe the spoon ready jobs become real ones.

Reply

Brad Rosley, CFP®

8:49 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

My neighbors happen to earn more money than me. I'm happy for them. They pay a lot more income tax every year and don't get any extra return on all the income tax they pay, I respect their hard work and success. More power to them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doremus Jessup

9:19 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Said the guy with the business Fortune Financial Group. Maybe we can lower the capital gains tax to zero, would that make you happy then? Unbelievable!

Leave a comment