School Board Members Say Lopsided Donations Creating Inequity in the District
Donation of a Smart Board to Edison School revives talk of creating a policy to ensure all students benefit equally from the generosity of donors.
What could be the down side to a donation for education?
District 205 Foundation hosts its annual FUNraiser, Midnight Masquerade and Christmas tree sale, among other events, to pay for enhanced educational opportunities for students. Individual school PTAs work tirelessly to raise money for classroom resources. And, you never know when an individual will decide to purchase some equipment for a classroom—or even stadium lights at York High School—with an out-of-pocket donation.
But without much oversight and direction from Elmhurst District 205 School Board, these donations are creating inequity among schools, board members said Tuesday.
The discussion started when board member John McDonough pulled a routine item off the superintendent's consent agenda. Before approving the donation of a $1,300 Smart Board for Edison School, he said he was troubled by "conflicting emotions."
"We're grateful for assistance when our finances are in a situation where difficult decisions have to be made," he said. "But at the same time, we need to be aware so that we don't fall into this situation of creating disparate learning environments."
Last month, in addition to a donation of a new scoreboard for Bryan Middle School, the board approved a donation of 13 Smart Boards to Emerson School.
"The social committee got together and worked hard to do that for their school," McDonough said. "I'm amazed every time at the things this community can do.
"(But) now Edison has six Smart Boards, there are 13 at Emerson, only one at Fischer and none at Churchville, Field, Jackson, Lincoln or Madison."
He noted that the district's strategic plan promises to provide equitable space and resources at all schools, and equitable educational opportunities and access to technology for all students.
There was no dissent among board members.
"We've got to get ahead of this," Chris Blum said. "We can't have these incredible, crazy imbalances within the district."
It's a problem that has been ongoing for many years, board member Maria Hirsch said. The board needs to work with PTAs and other organizations willing to help support education, she said.
"Our job is to educate them. How can they best assist us?" she said. "(We need to) come up with a better way to do this."
Karen Stuefen said she would like the donations to be "driven by curriculum and instruction."
"Everyone who wants to help students, we need to have them understand that we drive it," she said. "We drive the best utilization for the students and the outcome of education."
It is imperative that any action not discourage donations, board member Jim Collins said.
"It should be the goal of the board not to stop any of the streams of private money from entering our schools," he said. "There are people who want to support their particular building. We should encourage that. There are people that have an interest in having light at our stadium from 5:30 in the morning until 10 at night. We should not prohibit (donations) by diverting those monies to other uses."
McDonough said he would like PTA groups and the foundation to think about this dilemma and come up with ideas on how to take advantage of the donations while benefitting the entire district.
Superintendent David Pruneau said it is an issue that needs to be addressed as a matter of policy, but it should not impact the donation to Edison.
"We're kind of using Edison as an example tonight," he said. "It's not Edison's fault. We approved Emerson just last month, now all of a sudden we're saying we're going to change the game. It's a great policy discussion the board and community need to have."
As part of that discussion, Collins suggested they look at the "use of schools as laboratories."
"What proof do we have that those Smart Boards improve the quality of education?" he said. "We don't know the impact they'll have on our district until we try them."
He referred to a comment by McDonough, who said Lincoln School has 51 iPod Touch devices.
"I think it's great Lincoln has 51 iPods," Collins said. "If Lincoln starts outperforming their previous trends in a particular area, and it turns out we can link that back to those iPods, that is tremendous. Then we can start thinking about putting iPods in all our schools."
Technology Director David Smith said the district's new Curriculum Technology Committee will begin discussions Oct. 26 about how classrooms will be equipped in the future.
"We'll be getting ahead of the game as to where we want to go," he said.
Blum suggested putting together a "wish list" for the schools. Organizations could choose things on the list to donate.
The matter will be discussed at an upcoming Board Improvement and Policy Committee meeting, then brought back to the full board for approval.
"I think this will have a big impact on the district," Pruneau said.
Pat Gerace
8:57 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Perhaps the communities at Fischer,Churchville, Field, Jackson, Lincoln or Madison should follow the leads of the other schools and work to bring great tools to their local schools as well. Let us not drop to the least common denominator but rather raise the bar and work for everyone to have the best!
Lived in 5 other metro areas...
10:52 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
I like the comment, Pat. I believe that we cannot discourage donations. We arrived here 3+ years ago and we were discourage from donating to our individual schools because of this very issue. That if we donated, the items or dollars would become district property. It just doesn't feel right. I've found that plenty of people would donate if they knew up front what the $$ would go toward. Further, I know there is a good amount of dollars available sitting in the PTA's right now. We are on to something that could excite our teachers again. Let's do this! I love the direction. Keep going board. Karen, your point is valid, but be careful that in your attempt at caution, you don't cause stagnation.
Ron Sebonia
11:06 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
What's preventing the PTA's from each of the other schools from doing the same thing for their children? Is it an inequity? Perhaps so, but it is the type of inequity that should rally parents in each school to work together to bring the same tools to their school through their own efforts and not an inequity that requires the board acting to inhibit generosity. People want to donate where their dollars will have the biggest impact on their children. This should be encouraged, not discouraged. If "wish lists" are to be created, they should be created at the individual schools and not district level, with parents, teachers, and administrators working in concert.
Lived in 5 other metro areas...
11:11 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Relax, now...Everyone is working for the same goals. I've gound that many PTA pres's and school leaders can be overwhelmed with all that needs to be done daily. Nothing wrong with the board being the guides to all our schools especially if they are dedicated to researching and trying new things. We will make mistakes, but hopefully good educated ones that still encourage good learning. I have faith in people's intentions or they wouldn't be doing these jobs. Lets lift them up, not burden them.
concerned citizen
4:55 pm on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Isn't the purpose of the Foundation to distribute grants for this type of equipment and equalize the opportunities for education across the district? There is an obvious income gap between schools. There is no way those schools that have close to 50% free or reduced lunch are going to have parents who can fork out thousands of dollars for technology. I don't know if it will ever be equal, but I donate my dollars to the Elmhurst Foundation for Excellence so that cutting edge ideas across the district have an equal chance at getting their wishes.
Darlene Heslop
9:10 pm on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
i agree w/your observations, c. c. - and your donating to the foundation seems to be the best way at the present time to assure that each school has the opportunity to benefit.
Paul Guerino
9:35 pm on Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Unless things have changed the, Foundation gives money based on requests. If you have an idea, for your classroom or school, you present it to the Foundation and ask for the money to follow through on the idea. The foundation then might give the money to implement the idea. They didn't divide the money equally among all the schools to obtain what each school wanted..
MIKE
8:21 am on Thursday, October 27, 2011
Donations to a tax supported school system, hmmmm. Shouldn't we donate to organizations that provide soup kitchens, mental health services, & registered charities?
I think the foundation is great, but what about UNICEF or Catholic Charities or your church or even the Salvation Army or Doctors without Borders. These organizations do so much to promote charity and eliminate poverty. Support the ideas of the foundation but the other charities really go so much further than to end poverty.
Lived in 5 other metro areas...
8:42 am on Thursday, October 27, 2011
I love the healthy question. The best answer is that we are all already supporting these other organizations and many more: all the cancer orgs., museums, natural disaster orgs. MS, and many many more. We are a very giving society. Consider they people who will be supporting the orgs and running them in 15 plus years...Including the schools and their supporting boards and committees.
MIKE
9:43 am on Thursday, October 27, 2011
10+ yrs. ago, the Foundation had some controversial issues about paying some of the people there some healthy salaries - isn't this group strictly volunteer or what is the story? Do people at the 205 Foundation get paid?
Paul Guerino
9:02 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011
Mike. Why don't you call the BOE office and ask for an answer?
Joe. What do pension liabilities have to do with this article?