patching...
Update: Have you liked us on Facebook yet? »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Obama Supporters at McCormick: 'We Know He's Going to Win'

Obama supporters from around the suburbs and the city of Chicago waited to see the president during an election night rally in McCormick Place.

 
0 of 0
Ignacio Ayala and Charles Sucholl, both from Plainfield
Photos (5)

Photos

Waiting for the president to arrive at McCormick Place on election night, supporter Ignacio Ayala of Plainfield said he hoped the night would bring some of the same excitement as the rally in Grant Park in 2008.

"I hope it's the same," said Ayala. "That was big."

More than 10,000 people are expected to rally around President Barack Obama as he and his campaign members await election results tonight. Like Ayala, other Obama supporters said they, too, were hopeful that the election results would bring cause for celebration.

Elvin and Nicole Knox, from Homewood, said they had been checking predictions on CNN and Politico all day. Nicole said she had voted for Bush in 2004, and her husband said he had voted for Bush or had not voted at all. Both consider themselves independent.

"Obama, to me, genuinely cares about what it means to govern people," she said.

Many said they believed four years was not enough for the president to accomplish what he set out to do in 2008.

"There's so much more to do, but it feels like progress," said Charles Sucholl, also from Plainfield. "He's really kind of taken the country on the path out of this mess."

Several volunteers from the south suburban Hazel Crest field office said they had been spending the last several weeks campaigning heavily, sending buses to Iowa and phone-banking for hours.

"We have prayed every day," said Joyce Hutchinson. "We know he's going to win."

Hutchinson said she believed the president was not in the office to "line his pockets" or for power, but for the good of the country. 

"We need more people like that in office," she said.

Waiting in the lobby of McCormick place, Obama volunteer Ashley Owen, from Chicago, was just hoping she would be able to get credentials to get in. She had a friend with an extra pass and was waiting for him to show up.

Owen was sick on election night in 2008 and was not able to attend the rally in Grant Park.

"This is my chance to try that again," she said.

Jen Fisher reporting for Patch from McCormick Place.

Related Topics: Barack Obama, McCormick Place, and election 2012

oldschool

9:25 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Not a chance, thankfully most of the people in this country have seen what a country club fraud Willard really is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Clutche

4:40 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No, those that voted for Obama want the gravy train to continue

Comment_arrow

frank booth

11:32 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

But you don't believe that Obama is a fraud, lying about Benghazi, among other things?

Walt Hines

6:14 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No those that voted for Obama were tired of the lies. Flip flopping is only good when cooking pancakes or an offensive lineman. He lost not only the electoral vote but the popular vote, the party is in trouble. The time is here for all to meet in the middle and work in a united way. The government as a whole needs to step up and do what's right for this country. Personally I'd like to close our doors and rely on each other. Bring the jobs home and keep the money here, take care of our own! Get out of these wars and out of everyone else's business. You can't have less government when we're always sticking our nose into other countries business, let them take care of themselves!

Reply

Terry Germany

6:32 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Mark your calendars for 3 years, 360 days. We will see how your president changes this country, he said "we need more time" well he now he has it. In four years he won't be able to blame Bush but he will find blame elsewhere I'm sure.
Remember this, that gas is $3.70 a gallon nationally (gas was $1.80 in 2008), unemployment is 8 percent, our debt is 16 trillon, we have no measureable inflation, construction is virtually stopped, ask the trades. Keep all this mind in 2016.
Obama is a community activist, he not a business man with knowledge of budgets, he never ran a company let alone a country, he has bowed down to nations, given away our dignity as a nation and handed out money like he can print it, OH that's right he can!!!!!!
He did one measurable thing in the presidency, nationalized healthcare and that is only going to help the ones who are too lazy to help themselves.
In the next 4 minus years he going to finish his job, bring us deeper in debt, liberalize the supreme court with 3 new justices that will allow the supreme court in the future overturn any bill that a republican lead admitistration will try to pass.
Inflation will be at a all time high, gas, food and energy will be skyrocketing.
The quality of the medical care we current have will fall to the levels of Canada.
AND finally Walt Himes you will have 14 million new citizens in your country he will legalize all the ilegal immigrants.
Try and find a job then.
RIP - USA
Terry G Germany

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

6:48 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Terry, pls learn some basic economics, especially about petroleum markets. The US government has very limited control over free-market prices and in particular OPEC-controlled markets!. Maybe tours the CME/CBOT.CBOE and visit the NYMEXbefore making poorly founded assumptions.

Comment_arrow

Jeff

6:51 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

@Terry - I agree with everything except your position on healthcare. There are certain things in a civilized society that must be available to all people and I consider healthcare to be one of those. Coming from the perspective of a contractor not covered under group policy insurance, getting coverage is nearly impossible if you have any medical conditions. If you are lucky enough to get it, better hope you do not get sick because they will find a way to drop you. At 32 I had a blood pressure reading of 140/90 and wasn't prescribed any medication by the Dr. who said we need to keep a watch on it. Several days later in the mail I had a letter that I had been dropped from my insurance that I had been paying premiums into for 2 years for 'having high blood pressure under the age of 35'. Insurance companies make money by insuring the healthy, not the sick, and privatizing this without mandate that they insure all people doesn't work. Not saying the way Obama did it was right but a single health issue can easily bankrupt an otherwise hard working family simply because of corporate greed. We aren't near the top when it comes to healthcare and countries you claim have it so bad in many regards have it better. WHO rates Canada higher and the US so I would drop the propaganda you have been fed by the privatized insurance companies that want to continue collecting premiums insuring the healthy.

Comment_arrow

Kimberly

6:58 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Where was gas $1.80 a gallon in 2008? If my memory serves correctly, I am pretty sure gasoline costs were higher when President Obama took office then they are right now. I think it might have been $1.80 a gallon when President Bush (W) took office in 2000.

Comment_arrow

tom

7:13 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Terry,

Gas prices were higher than they are now when Bush was in office.

http://gasbuddy.com/gb_retail_price_chart.aspx

Comment_arrow

OakLawnGuy

7:19 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

The President, no matter who it is, has no control over gas prices. There's a cartel in the Middle East that pulls the oil strings, and there are profit-hungry oil company CEOs who, beholden to stockholders, seek to maximize profits, and do so quite legally. The price of gas under Obama beef is hot air.

Comment_arrow

Baba Wawa

7:20 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

June 2008, gas was over $4 a gallon. Presidents do not have control over gas prices. Ironically, Bill O'Reilly of Faux News said that in 2008 -- when it was over $4 a gallon.

Comment_arrow

Jim

7:34 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

It is true - gas was about 1.80 per gallon when Obama took office in Jan
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMM_EPM0_PTE_NUS_DPG&f=W

There are a lot of market forces at play and I don't think we can blame him.
We can, however, blame him for persistently high unemployment.

Comment_arrow

Stones

8:27 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Terry, most of your statements are wrong or contradictory. We all know, as pointed out by many others about the gas prices. You complain that "we have no measureable inflation" and later complain "Inflation will be at a all time high". Which is it?

You are way off base on healthcare. It's not "nationalized healthcare" that will be just like Canada. Nor is it socialized healthcare. It's healthcare insurance reform and will change the manner in which healthcare is provided, only access to those who may not be able to get it on their own. Would you rather pay your premiums or all of your healthcare out of pocket? That's the difference.

The notion that we need a businesman as president is misguided, running the government is quite a bit different with Congress there to keep you in check. Plus Mitt Romney is not a businessman in the traditional sense, he's a venture capitalist. Which means his focus is to turn a profit. He's very good at that but much to the harm of those who works for the companies he buys and shifts jobs overseas.

Most of your other complaints are based on misinformation and lies. It's scary to think so many want President Obama to fail, rather than see him succeed and make America better than it is today.

Comment_arrow

laura

9:21 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Also, Terry, regarding your ill-informed comments about nationalized healthcare only helping those too lazy to work: You surely are delusional if you truly believe this. People who are unable to AFFORD healthcare should still have the ability to access it. At what point should someone's life be worth LESS simply because he'she does not have access to the same quality healthcare as those with the big bucks or corporate insurance to cover it? Don't talk about what you don't experience!! So you are implying that children, people with pre-existing conditions or the elderly who can not afford the gaps in coverage are LAZY? YOU should be ashamed. When your child has a pre-existing condition and cannot get a job that covers his/her lifelong condition, or your own mother can't afford the drugs she needs to alleviate her chronic pain, then come back to me with your so-Christian line of reasoning. Get a life!

Comment_arrow

Terry Germany

9:38 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Laura
It appears that you have a great deal of hostility in your words, cant wait the next comment, there getting better.
Basic Economics Laura - really can you spend what you don't have, yes if you want to tax the heck of the people.
Its typical you won election and your still not happy.
Definition of a democrat! __ Never happy.
Sit back and think about it YOU WON - and still defending all of above! Hmmm interesting.

Comment_arrow

Jewelbug

11:45 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Terry, I agree with you on so many levels.. A president who had no budget for four years? Obviously ~ look at how he spends money! Then he borrows, so he can spend more. We know exactly where he wants this country to land, smack into the lap of socialism, which, btw, is a step above communism. Those who can't see thru him by now ought to educate themselves. He is one demon! and the sheep who blindly follow? Mindless.

Terry Germany

7:21 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Let see where we are in 2016. History is now in the hands of Obama.
I hope for my children and your children I'm wrong. Dead wrong and in 4 years rub this in my face.
Laura look at the big picture or have your drank too much kool-aid!
Good day no further comments.
Terry

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ray

7:36 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Terry, you're greatly underestimating the likes of McConnell, Cantor and Boehner ....remember they did their best to tank our economy and keep unemployment as high as they could, to keep things as bad as possible in advance of the election. Because the election - not a stronger America - was the primary goal.
Maybe they won't be so vehement about it this time and actually try to do their jobs? It's not all in Obama's hands.

Comment_arrow

laura

9:05 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Terry, perhaps you should look in the mirror when you make uninformed statements about who drank whose Kooiaide. Brush up on free-market economics before you make yourself look even more gullible and uneducated! We all are laughing at your platitudes.

Comment_arrow

Terry Germany

9:08 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

We'll see who is laughing in 4 years.

Comment_arrow

laura

10:02 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Terry, I read in your comments the typical mindset of someone who can't think on his/her own. No one "won" and election simply gives them a once every four year opportunity to voice an opinion. Your remarks are devisive at best. The outcome evolves over time. If you think Democrats "won" and Republicans "lost," then I feel sorry for you. People vote according to their consciences and self-interests. That's exactly what a free election IS. The majority of the people felt one way more than another way. Period. Get used to the system. As far as anger about health care, yes, I do harbor anger toward people who would deprive others of equivalent health care based on economic status. So, money = quality of health or life itself? I'd suggest you return to college (assuming you attended one) and take come philosophy, ethics and humanities classes. They do tend to open your mind, make your more compassionate and require you to at least think about and question teh validiity of your ingrained attitudes, though it may well be too late for you, gauging by your close-minded comments. Nothing is ever really black and white.

Comment_arrow

4th wright

1:34 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Laura, thanks for proving my point (see below). You are certainly entitled to your opinion, just as Terry is entitled to his. It does not mean one of you is smart or one of you is dumb. Most of us are either blind in the right eye or blind in the left.But to say that no one won and no one lost the election, well, to use your own comment, "You surely are delusional if you truly believe this." Someone certainly DID win, and someone certainly lost. Political parties (spit on the floor) do not spend hundreds of millions of dollars every two years to come to a draw and sing "Kumbala" with the opposition. It's okay for you to feel good. Judging from what you wrote, you backed Obama (psst - that means you won). Terry obviously lost, and does not feel like singing Kumbala right now. That's okay too. Give him time to settle down. Victory and defeat are both fleeting.

Walt Hines

7:34 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Your country, your President, you can always move Terry. Did you bother to help the Romn's out?

I'm not thrilled about the across the board legalization of immigrants either but I also am not the sole owner of the USA. Heathcare is one thing I know too much about. We lost our care when my deceased wife was battling breast cancer so I know what it's like to drain your entire life savings to save a loved one. I have no care because I'm deaf in one ear. The insurance companies are a big scam made to make huge profits, that's why they don't want universal they won't be able to line their pockets.

Close the borders, bring the jobs home, stop playing big brother and dump the tax-dodgers in the countries that their money supports. That would include both parties! And for the love of God please take the "Donald" with you, his comb over is messing with his brain.

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

10:06 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Thanks, Walt, for your reason. I hope you & your girls are well today. Cheers!

4th wright

9:31 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

The descent continues. This country hasn't been united since September 11, 2001, and then only for a few days. I get so tired of the tribal wrangling over whose side is better, whose side will save the day, whose side represents "the people". It makes it so easy to demonize those other people who don't think as we do. "You have to be crazy to think a fetus is a person." Or, "You have to be a moron to allow health care reform." "They" are stupid, or "they" are the problem, or "they" are trying to take my money. If you offer and opinion you are a racist, or an obstructionist, or greedy, or out of touch with reality. And our little lives go on, the puppeteers in Washington and Springfield providing us with momentary illusions of being in control, all the while knowing they have the real power.It's why they're there. If they feel threatened, they will lie about the opposition, change the district boundaries, or lean on the courts. They do not even need to fear arrest, unless it is so outrageous that not even the judges can let them off.

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

8:08 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

4th wright,Thank you for a reasoned approach and debate.
I respectfully appreciate your insight but disagree with your premise that one side "lost" and the other "won." If we, as humans, simply viewed all others as humans in need, there would be no sides, would there? Idealistic? Yes! Possible? Dunno... I'd love to think so....perhaps in another world.

4th wright

9:44 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

We have the illusion of freedom. We own nothing that they cannot take from us. You do not own your home, you rent it from the government. Try not paying your taxes on the home you "own" and see how long you still live there. Some will say it is the price we pay for democracy. What kind of democracy allow the possibility for a person to become president without earning the popular majority? What kind of democracy pays senators and congressmen salaries and benefits far beyond the reach of the people they purport to represent? What kind of democracy allows hundreds of millions of dollars to be spent on political campaigns every 2 years for politicians to retain their power, while they lament the conditions of the poor? What kind of democracy permits Madigan to remain in power for decades over those who did not elect him?

I am not an anarchist. I am a liberal AND a conservative, a republican AND a democrat. I am a patriot, and I love my fellow Americans. Regardless of their party affiliation or sexual orientation or social status or race or religious belief or non-belief. I simply do not trust our overlords.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Russ

11:47 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Well said 4th wright,
We are all in this together. I think the most patriotic thing we can do in our country is to get involved with our government and society. Go to the food pantries, charities, like Feed My Staving Children, volunteer for community causes. Get to know each other. If you just sit in your chair and say how bad it is, that will be your reward. We are our own worst enemy. How many people vote in the primary elections or the off year (non presidential) general elections? I am a witness to this because when I vote on those days, it is sad to see no one around. Have you ever met with your state representative, called your congressman, wrote your senator or president? Have you ever personally gone to Springfield to lobby for a cause. I have. I have seen individual families meet with their local state representatives to have their grievances heard. This system only works, when those in charge know we care and are watching their progress. If the people don't get involved, special corporate interests will.
It amazes me how even now some of these commenters cling to the notion that our president doesn't have any experience. Where have they been for the past four years? I am so glad Obama gets four more years to get us out of this mess. If you look at history FDR had much more time than that to get us back on the right track.
Give this president your support, vote and be heard. Stop being the invisible society.

russ harrison

11:12 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I believe the GOP made some obvious errors during this election,and some not so obvious errors.The "establishment" GOP leadership has still refused to accept a major factor in the loss of the 2012 election.That factor is the number of moderate GOP members that refused to accept the GOP candidate(s).There is still no indication that GOP leaders even acknowledge this factor after the loss.This supports the claim that many GOP members are unhappy with the archaic strategies and policies that the GOP leadership continues to aggressively, and without compromise,force upon its members.While their beliefs may be acceptable to the fanatics and swallowed by the "sheep",the middle moderates simply did not buy it and showed their disatisfaction by voting for the other guy.Whenever a party refuses to accept the input of the moderate and semi liberal members,that party alienates a large voting block.
This election was won on facebook,twitter,Patch and YouTube,not by Super Pacs and TV blitzes.It was won on Stewart and Colbert's shows,not on O'Reilly and Wallace's.Scare tactics and lies did not work.The GOP did not evolve in policies nor in acceptance and use of the power of social media and satire.The old days of "Go ahead, lie,scare the hell out of them...they won't find out until the election is over!"have gone away,and the GOP simply did not accept it.ROAR (Republicans Outraged About Romney) and other GOP groups' concerns were ignored by the GOP establishment...and Obama won.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ray

1:03 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I think it's discomforting that, given how close it was in many states, lies actually did work to some extent....Caught in a lie? Ignore it and just keep repeating it anyway. Before you know it, a lot of citizens are parroting the same lies as though they're fact. Fortunately it didn't work with a majority, but it was a little close for comfort..

Chris Randolph

2:42 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

This is all just one big boring argument, that accomplishes nothing. It is "We, the People", not "We (except for you underprivileged ones over there), the People".
RESPECT your President. RESPECT your country. RESPECT each other. Quit complaining and work together to solve the problems we are facing.

Reply

Sean M Morrison

3:03 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

first few comments;
I will respect the president when he the president respects the office he holds and the Constitution!

There is a huge difference between access to medical care and forced taxing the citizens to pay for your medical care!
I for one have my own family to pay for, I surely do not need to be "forced by law" to provide for yours. that is my problem with this healthcare LAW folks.
that said we most definitely do have an " moral obligation"...careful now, read this again; I said a moral obligation, NOT A FORCED LAW.. to provide for our nations: sick, mentally & physically ill, downtrodden, aged, widows an orphans.
the CBO own estimate, over 60% of all combined social programs are abused.

we need to fix things, unless we all agree to at least that principle to really honestly "fix" things, than we are doomed to a horrific fiscal fate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Randolph

3:55 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Sean, do you help pay for roads that are used by everyone? Do you help pay for schools to educate other's children? Do you help pay for police protection for others? Do you help pay for fire protection when your neighbor's house is burning down? Yes, we all do. And those are forced laws (your words) So where is your outrage on all of that too? We don't individually pick and choose what we want to contribute too. This is not a la carte. Do some people abuse social programs...yes. Do some people abuse tax laws to pay less taxes...yes. But most people do not.

Comment_arrow

Jim

4:34 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Chris Randolph, you say, "We don't individually pick and choose what we want to contribute too."

So roads, police , fire, health care...how about food? Cars? Gas? Clothing? Cable?

They tried this noble experiment in eastern Bloc countries - it was a failure

Comment_arrow

laura

8:14 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Ergo, Sean, you believe that private and for-profit institutions will provide health care for all those in need? That, push comes to shove, privitizing healthcare will somehow reach out to all those who currently can't afford medical treatment? Correct me if I have misconstrued your intent. But privitizing health care means introducing an even larger for-profit motive that none of us can afford. IF, however, there wer CAPS of for-profit profits arising from that care... BUT that seems like a pipedream.

Comment_arrow

Laura D

2:24 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Sean, you all ready pay for the uninsured, that is why a band aid costs $20.00 in a hospital. The hospital passes the cost of the uninsured to the insurance companies,they pass it on to us. President Reagan signed the law mandating hospitals provide treatment to all regardless of insurance.

Kathy

4:36 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Chris, the difference is that those are traditional infrastructure governmental responsibilities, health care is already covered under medicare/medicaid. Overhaul that if there is a problem with the system. Don't hide and obfuscate what is really going on here, which is there isn't enough money to pay for existing programs, so a new tax was created! Let's call it what it really is, OK? And as a program it's terrible. Too expensive, and no one understands it or it's ramifications.

Reply

russ harrison

7:00 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The Sherman Act has never been applied to Health Care Insurers in the US. That means that price fixing is not controlled... So how do we get around the problem of no control over the costs? Well, normally free market pricing would ensure competitive pricing, but that is not the case here...the game is, and always has been, rigged against the consumer. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is designed to force insurers to compete against a lower priced, equal quality product. This SHOULD lower premiums across the board. However, unless a National Health Care System with some real teeth comes along, this ACA, while having merit, will still be little more than a starting point for an evolution of social morality and restructuring of programs to help the eldery, the infirmed, and the disadvantaged.

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

9:51 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Well-stated! Thank you, Russ.

Comment_arrow

Kent Frederick

10:28 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

One idea that the Republicans had was to allow individuals to buy insurance from any insurer, regardless where they do business. If an individual wants to buy insurance, he is limited to insurers licensed to do business in the state he resides.

So are businesses that have locations solely in one state. But for a company that has locations in multiple states, they can contract with any isurer in any of the states that they have a location. That's why a company based on the East Coast, with offices in multiple states, could have all employees on Blue Cross/Blue Shield of California.

So, if someone living in Downers Grove could get a policy from a California, Florida, or New York insurer, the increase in options would bring down the cost of insurance.

Chronicles of Bob

11:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Yes, i have formed my idea that you are an idiot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

1:46 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

CoB, make that two of us who came to that conclusion!

Chronicles of Bob

12:17 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I saw donnie trump driving a caddy... is he one of these non hard workers you speak of?
I think your parents should be in investigated if they are here legally. I mean after all, you did lump all immigrants into one large lazy cheating bubble...
Golly, it muat be hard being you... working so much, busting your ass, getting that top education and only being able to afford a beat up toyota...

Reply

Billable Hours

12:31 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Everyone is so fired up today! There must be a game tonight!!!!

Reply

Chronicles of Bob

12:34 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

No, I think many feel Romney has a chance.

Reply

Terry Germany

4:43 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Mrs. Goodfellas, don't waste your time trying to be rationalize with any of them, for one Laura is to far superior to come down to our level of discussion.
Laura you crack me up all day long you jump from blog to blog bantering.
I had to turn off my notifications from the Patch! Don't you have a life, are you a frustrated middle aged spinster or are you on company time posting your senseless jibber jabber...hope the boss doesn't find out!!! .. Because I know you don't own a business when would you have time to take care of the day operation when your on the blogs all day...
Grab a glass of fine wine and read a book might help with those hot flashes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

5:04 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Interesting, Terry Germany, that YOU seem to have an inordinate amount of time on your hands. Business not so good these days, huh? Oh well, lean back in that easy chair and crack another beer! It might help with those issues that might require Viagra or Cialis. Oh right, THOSE are covered even under the Republicans's healtcare plan. Now wonder why! LOL... you guys slay me.

Walt Hines

5:27 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Well, well, well can anyone say BIGOT! Unless you're of Native American( yes I' am) descent Mrs Good fella, Vera, PLC, you're here because of immigration. Aint that something.

Latinos, African Americans, Chinese etc.. are a nationality or race. Mormons are a religion and unless they're wearing their magic under wear on their heads or have "Mormon" tattooed on their face it's not going to be obvious. Unless...

Got to give them credit for voting their "guy" in. Can't say that about the Romns. Poor guy couldn't get the gang together and get out the vote. All that money ( not here of course) and he still couldn't buy his way into the white house. He loss to a bunch of Blacks, Latinos, Aliens, Big Bird and don't forget the " we have a voice and we'll use it, WOMEN" Un-flipping believable! These people that God created actually have a brain, the white man just learned something! NO WAY!!!

This Heinz 57 man has 3 jobs because the Mormon walks the earth and his God is money. At the 2 part-time jobs I'm the only "white guy" there. I asked my boss why that is and guess what, the white guys felt the job was beneath them so they're the ones on public assistance right now and cashing in on food stamps. Your white collar white man won't sling hash, it's beneath them. I'm doing what I have to in-order to keep the roof over my kids heads and food on the table.

Hey white guy, call the Romns and ask him why he sent your job overseas. He loves the foreigners!!!!

Reply

Terry Germany

5:32 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Stay not slay. Spell check sweetie, I did hit the sweet spot on the hot flashes hahahahhahahhahahahahha good night

Reply
Comment_arrow

laura

5:38 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Nope, Sweetie, not a typo at all... the word is "slay," meaning to "amuse"... you might to to look it up at www.merriamwebster.com. LMAO!!

Comment_arrow

laura

5:42 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Here, Sweetie, I did the work for you:
slay verb \ˈslā\
slew also especially in sense 2 slayedslain slay·ing
Definition of SLAY
transitive verb
1
: to kill violently, wantonly, or in great numbers; broadly : to strike down : kill
2
: to delight or amuse immensely <slayed the audience>
intransitive verb

YOU ARE Amusing!!!

Comment_arrow

Emily

6:53 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I'll use it in a sentence. Laura, you slay me.

Terry Germany

6:12 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

All of your comments have to do with violence and rage! Wow my mistake on what you were intending to say.
The hubby must be the silent type or none at all.
Enjoy your evening alone. Put some ice on it!
Night Ms. Laura,
My daughter is in her second year at Milikin studying psychology is laughing her butt off at your comments. Shes already diagnosed you. Should we send a bill to your heathllcare provider, oh that would be me and everyone on this blog plus 65 million others.
Signing off must get up bright and early to work my fingers to bone in order to keep the economy of America going.
Bet your off tomorrow...... Public job, pension HA, teacher that's it! Your going to retire at 90% of the last ten years of tenure. What the deficit for pensions in Illinois smarty pants. By the way the dems have run this state into the ground NO Argument from you or counterparts on that one...
Now only try to respond to the last sentence first bet you can't!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Emily

6:54 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Nothing says know it all quite like a 2nd year psychology student.

laura

6:47 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Rage? Really?? Hmmm, guess "slay" as in "amuse" is too complex a usage for you, Terry. Psychology? Really. Oh well, I wish her well in this job market. I do hope those Pell grants (which the Demoncrats saved from the chopping block) are still available for her. And I really should resist your baits but can't: If we must brag, mine graduated two quarters early from Northwestern Univ in Evanston, with a double major economics & social policy. And no, not a dollar of indebtedness (it's call financial planning!) The social policy aspect lends humanity to the economics you so clearly don't understand.
Nope, not a teacher or on public dole. In finance, rather like the Mr Romney that you so admire. Difference is, you don't need to export jobs and ruin families to do it. And actually, I'm going out tonight for dinner with my SO. Have a wonderful evening, Terry. You seem so bitter and can't tolerate a smart, productive, high-earning woman. Do try to keep up next time...

Reply

Patch61

7:38 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Walt I congratulate you for doing what you need to do, though I do not share most of your political views notably on "outsourcing."

Two G-7 economies far more tightly protected than ours, by the government, are floundering: France and Italy. So-called "insourcing" simply makes the country's economy less competitive and leads to higher unemployment.

Also, funny no one at the Patch ever talks about the $16,000,000,000,000 in national debt, (only $9,000,000,000,000 when Obama took over), the $1,800,000,000,000 in new money literally printed in the last 4 years, or when Downers Grove will become bankrupt as is projected for 85% of the USA's municipalities within 15 years.

I guess the facts are hard to process; it's easier to write platitudes, party lines, and such.

When will D.G. declare bankruptcy? 2020? 2025?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stones

11:11 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Patch61, The national debt $11 trillion when President Obama took office. How much of the $5 trillion in addition debt can be attributed to two wars? Most knowlegeable economists put an overall price tag of $4.3 trillion. Seems that's a big chunk of the debt, wouldn't you say?

We have a mess, how about everyone work together to clean it up.

Jeff

3:20 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012

This is going to be one rough ride. I project decreasing unemployment through 2014 and then another depression except worse than before. Inflation will hit and it will hit hard and Bernake will blame top down pressure when explaining why everything costs 10 fold. Hold onto your guns.

Reply

Leave a comment