patching...
Update: Have you liked us on Facebook yet? »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hahn Street Requests for Proposals Go Out Feb. 1

City of Elmhurst looking for developers' creative ideas on project that has languished since it was first envisioned in 2006.

 

Developers with a good idea—and the financial backing to make it reality—will soon be invited to submit to the city their vision for the land near York Road and North Avenue known as the Hahn Street parcel.

A request for proposals for a new development on the land, bordered by North Avenue, York Road, Addison and Third streets, will go out on Feb. 1. Ideas are due April 15.

Elmhurst City Council added the final touches to the RFP Monday night. A draft of the request was presented in November, and since then, city staff have surveyed aldermen to ask how to evaluate proposals.

Aldermen will use a 100-point ranking system, with some factors, such as economic viability, architecture and qualifications of the applicant, worth more points. Other factors include parking, open space, site plan, land use and sustainability.

The site in question was part of the downtown tax increment financing district (TIF 1) that was established in 1986, but economic decline stalled development there. The developer formerly under contract with the city since 2008, Morningside Group, was let out of its contract by the city last March. The Hahn parcels were then moved into the North York Road TIF, which stretches up to Grand Avenue.

Assistant City Manager Mike Kopp said there already are about 25 developers that have expressed interest in the site, but the city also will advertise the RFP.

First Ward Alderman Diane Gutenkauf shared some comments from residents, including a desire for housing options for empty nesters and for green space around any new construction.

Aldermen stressed again that they are looking for creativity as well as economic success. Consultants advised the city last year to seek out an apartment complex for the site, a suggestion that didn't sit well with several aldermen.

“It's very important that we keep an open mind at this time,” 6th Ward Alderman Steve Morley said.

What kind of development would you like to see on the Hahn Street parcel? Let us know in the comments.

Related Topics: Elmhurst City Council, Hahn Street Development, TIF 4, and requests for proposals

Elmhurst

11:36 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Just don't build another backwards facing eyesore like those 2 on North and 83! Who in the world thought that was a good idea? How did those plans even get passed? Vote out or fire whoever approved that!

Reply

Steve

12:52 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

The North and 83 buildings were not approved by anyone. They followed the zoning code and did not receive any public incentive or monies. So, they were able to build what they want according to code.

Reply

Jan

3:14 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

6 years ago, the developer went to the city council and asked for zoning variations so he could build a nice, normal, development on that corner. A couple of the neighbors complained and the dysfunctional city council at the time denied his requests. So, he built what he built within code, without any variances or help from the city.
So, we all get to stare at the ass end of the development for the next 50 years or so.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan

4:29 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

That is what I remember also. That is one ugly commercial project.

Comment_arrow

John Iwaszkiewicz

3:42 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

The city council refused a few logical requests for variances that were completely appropriate and reasonable for the busiest intersection in the State of Illinois. The city council was weak and listened to a local vocal minority who opposed the development of the site on the grounds that it would disturb the neighborhood, as if the intersection of Route 83 and North Ave. one hundred yards away was non-existent. Without cooperation from the city, the owner had no incentive to put a building in place that would generate the maximum sales tax revenues. As a result, our community was gifted with an ass backwards structure, and the tax dollars that corner should be generating are forever lost, but the aldermen can always grab the political cover of "they listened to the neighbors".

dan cline

6:37 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

A few questions: How long has the city owned this property? What was the original cost? What is it's value today? Should the city be in the business of property developement?

Reply

JJ

10:26 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Upscale restaurant with piano bar and/or Live Music on Weekends. Not a a Sinatra singer :)....blues?

Reply

auntiejane

6:17 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I would love to see an active adult -55 or over- building with amenities and good maintenance on either the Hahn site or the north York properties. The city could use moderate or upscale senior housing without the huge buy-in fees of Park Place. Retail/restaurants on the site along with parking would be a great addition. To those who don't want to see rental units - seniors aren't going to leave a good rental building and aren't transcients!!

Reply

Leave a comment